How a Chinese State-Owned Trader Became a Climate Leader
Skip to content
GreenBiz | Trellis Impact
Nominate a Speaker for Trellis Impact 27 (Deadline: November 20)
Topics | Events
- In-person Events (View All)
- Webinars
- Network
- Media Kit
- Job Board
- About
Subscribe to Trellis Briefing
Receive sustainability news and insights in one concise morning email.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Email address *
utmCampaignLast, utmMediumLast, utmSourceLast
Subscribe
Chasing Net Zero: A Look at Food & Agriculture
How a Chinese State-Owned Trader Became the Climate Leader Among Ag Giants
China is seemingly employing its industrial policy strategy in a new sector: food and agriculture.
Key Takeaways:
- Ambitious Goals: Chinese agricultural trader COFCO has set impressive emissions reduction targets.
- Government Strategy: This is part of China's long-term food security plan.
- Western Rivals' Struggles: Most of COFCO's competitors are falling short in achieving their emissions goals.
Over the past two decades, China's industrial policy has propelled it to the forefront of climate technologies, such as solar power, and electric vehicles in the U.S. Now, it's making waves in agriculture.
The world's largest agricultural traders, including COFCO International (the trading arm of China's largest agribusiness), source and sell vast amounts of commodities like corn and soy. Among these giants, COFCO has emerged as the sustainability leader, according to our series, Chasing Net Zero.
COFCO's Success:
- Emissions Reduction: The company has made significant progress toward its corn and soy emissions targets, validated under recent, stricter industry rules.
- Sustainability Strategy: COFCO links more than $1 billion in loans to its emissions targets, demonstrating its commitment.
Peer Comparison:
Leah Samberg, a lead scientist at the Accountability Framework initiative, highlights COFCO's uniqueness:
"I think they’re really an outlier. They’re definitely pretty out in front on this."
While COFCO shows clear progress, its competitors, including Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge, Cargill, and Louis Dreyfus, have not demonstrated similar emission reductions. Two of these companies have even backed out of validated SBTi commitments.
COFCO's advancements could significantly impact global emissions. However, the implications for Western rivals are concerning. If China takes the lead in sustainable agriculture, will Western businesses be left behind?